Monthly Archive May 2018

eDisclosure: some real life examples of the benefits of a Managed Service

eDisclosure (sometimes known as eDiscovery) is a complex process. With automated tools available some opt to manage these in-house but, unless highly skilled and experienced personnel are involved in the process, there is no guarantee that these tools will be used to their maximum effect or that mistakes will not be made. Given that the ultimate goal is court acceptance, many firms opt to work in partnership with an expert eDisclosure Managed Service provider.

SRM’s forensic team, established in 2002, is drawn from law enforcement, government agencies and military with over 60 years’ combined experience. The team has delivered thousands of cases supporting law firms, government agencies and commercial organisations in the accurate production of case papers and reports to be tendered in court. The following case studies show, in brief, the added value we bring to real-life eDisclosure cases.

FTSE 250 Company vs Local Authority

This case, involving a FTSE 250 company and a local authority related to the forensic collection of over 150GB of data. This data included the email accounts of 15 custodians and their shared work space folders on the server.

  • The forensic collection was carried out by trained, experienced forensic investigators which ensured the data was collected in its original state and the integrity of the data maintained.
  • Once collected, the data was processed using the Relativity eDiscovery platform which allows the analysis and review of the data by secure access.
  • When processed on the platform the data is automatically searched for duplicate documents and these are highlighted and removed from the data set. In this case we were left with over 460,000 documents for review.
  • Further reduction of the data set was achieved firstly by email threading which removes emails which are part of a thread and only highlights emails which are unique. Secondly agreed keyword searches were run across the data and only documents which contained a keyword hit remained in the data set.
  • The final number of documents for review was just under 260,000, nearly a 50% reduction which saved the reviewing lawyers considerable time when it came to the review of the documents.

Two large companies in the service industries

A litigation between 2 large companies in the service industries involved the collection of data which was in excess of 1.2TB.  What made this eDiscovery task more complex was the format of the data. The usual email server was captured as well as 8 laptop computers and 2 mobile phones.

  • The total volume of data captured could have been processed directly onto the Relativity platform at great expense to the client due to the volume. To reduce the volume SRM used forensic software to identify irrelevant documents such as system files and other known files commonly found on digital devices. Files such as documents, spread sheets, pdfs and emails were identified and extracted.
  • The ability of SRM to use forensic tools to reduce the data volume prior to processing onto the platform is a method which saves the client money and time when it comes to processing and reviewing the data.
  • The reduction in the data went from 2 TB to 160 GB which was then uploaded to the Relativity platform. This was then de duplicated, threaded and keyword searches were run across the data to further reduce the volume.

 Secretary of State vs PLC

 A litigation between a Secretary of State and a large PLC involved the forensic collection of over 30 GB of data. This data included email accounts and shared work space folders on the server. Prior to the forensic collection of the data, forensic investigators at SRM were named in the court order as being the only persons who could handle the data. This was based on the experience, background and vetting of the individuals.

  • Once collected, the data was processed using the Relativity eDiscovery platform which allows the analysis and review of the data by secure access. When processed on the platform the data is automatically searched for duplicate documents and these are highlighted and removed from the data set.
  • Further reduction of the data set was achieved firstly by email threading, which removes emails which are part of a thread and only highlights emails which are unique. Secondly, agreed keyword searches were run across the data and only documents which contained a keyword hit remained in the data set.
  • The method of usage of the Relativity platform in this case proved innovative because it was used by both parties in the litigation as well as an independent party appointed by the court. This involved setting up of 3 separate review platforms each one restrictive to the other parties.
  • In addition to being used for review, the separate platforms were used as a repository for shared documents along with comments which were placed on the documents by other parties.
  • The forensic investigators under instruction was also responsible for the redaction of documents which contained privileged or irrelevant material.
  • By using the named individuals in SRM considerable time and expense was saved by the client when it came to the review. In total the 6 million documents were reduced to 17,000 for review.

The head of SRM’s eDisclosure team Colin Gray hosted a live (free) webinar on the benefits of a Managed eDiscovery service on Wedneday 18th April at 3pm. A recorded version is now available. To view, click here.

To find out more about SRM’s Managed eDisclosure service, contact Mark Nordstrom on mark.nordstrom@srm-solutions.com or 03450 21 21 51.

To find out about the specific benefits, visit our website.

Or see our blog.

The key to GDPR is common sense

by Tom Fairfax, Managing Director

It is not often that EU-wide legislation is likened to a children’s story. Consider, however, the story of Goldilocks and the three bears. When it comes to the General Data Protection Regulation there are three types of organisation. There are those who are running around in a state of panic, going completely over the top, deleting all their data and sending frenzied emails to their databases. There are others who are simply doing nothing. Then there is the third group which is following and communicating a measured plan and, in short, doing it just right. The key is common sense.

The fact is that most people probably need to be doing something. There is a clear obligation to act and doing nothing is simply not an option. The policy of ‘let’s wait and see’ or corporate procrastination will only lead to tears at bedtime. GDPR builds on existing Data Protection legislation, protecting the rights of individuals and their data and this means that every organisation from a small voluntary group to a large multinational must have an enacted plan or risk falling foul of the regulation.

Organisations and individuals alike should already have a clear idea of what they need to do. If they haven’t they should step back and think about what personal data they hold and why.  Many of us may still be holding unnecessary levels of personal data; many of us will have failed to consider what data we actually need and many may have failed to get appropriate permissions.  For the majority of organisations it may be necessary (and possibly desirable) to have a robust data weeding project.  Some data, however, is likely to be held for legitimate operational purposes, and in some cases, its wanton destruction may disenfranchise stakeholders.

Common sense should prevail. Data collection, storage and processing should be driven by a business need and supported by appropriate permissions.  It is also necessary to think hard about when information actually becomes redundant and to have a sensible process to pick this up and delete it.  This is not new: we should really have been doing this anyway.  The ‘just right’ group will have worked out what they need to do and will have made a plan.

The important thing to remember is that whilst GDPR does not actually have an explicit compliance programme, its key intent is to ensure the safety of personal data.  For those wrestling with widespread compliance, those following the compliance guidelines of regulatory bodies such as the Payment Card Industry, Mifid II (for the financial industry) or the international standards such as ISO 27001 will have done much of the work already and will just need to understand the gaps that exist.

If a system is properly safeguarded with an inbuilt process of compliance, maintenance and development through these recognised compliance processes then many of the principles of GDPR will likely be adhered to. The job of the Data Protection Officer (DPO) or Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is to complete due diligence to ensure this is the case. Professional expert guidance will provide these key individuals with the support they require in making these judgement calls.

It is not sufficient to simply draw up a policy, however, no matter how detailed, informed or expert it may be. Plans and policies simply demonstrate management intent. If the plan is not disseminated and implemented and if clear, understandable guidelines are not provided in a timely way, even those with a meticulous plan will simply be left with cold porridge.

 

How PCI compliance puts you on course for GDPR

For a long time the General Data Protection Regulation has been looming on the horizon but in just a few short days it will arrive; a permanent aspect of the data protection landscape. From 25th May 2018 this European-wide data protection will be a legal requirement for virtually every UK organisation. The task should not be overwhelming; particularly for those who are already PCI compliant, or working towards it. This is because the PCI compliance process means they are already well on course for GDPR. All that remains is an identification of gaps to bring systems and policies in line with GDPR.

The important thing to bear in mind at this stage is that the GDPR, although aimed at the entirety of an organisation and largely enforceable, is less prescriptive than the PCI DSS standard that already exists. GDPR provides detail about what needs protecting but very little in the way of a solid action plan.

PCI DSS on the other hand offers a detailed framework upon which to build, specifying what needs to be done and how, and even giving regular updates and guidance on reviews. The two complement each other and therefore the GDPR will be best enacted alongside the existing PCI DSS. A further aspect to note, is that a PCI breach will also be a GDPR breach, since the information on your cardholder data environment is subject to regulation by GDPR.

GDPR should not be seen in a negative way. It is a positive piece of legislation which will help to build trust. Similarly, PCI DSS compliance provides you and your customers with peace of mind that data is secure. This is the metaphorical carrot. There is also a stick: those who do not comply and suffer a breach will face loss of customer trust, enforced PFI investigations and fines.

For those that are already compliant with the PCI DSS, an annual review of the data being processed should form an integral part of the project. This ensures that any new technologies or processes are not excluded and ongoing compliance is maintained. Once you have identified the data that GDPR affects, applying the PCI approach to the implementation of the GDPR will assist greatly as the framework is already there. There will still be a few gaps to fully adhere to GDPR so professional advice will be of benefit.

And for those who aren’t PCI compliant? Seeking guidance from a qualified advisor and reviewing the gaps in their documentation, policies, training, IT systems and processes should be a pressing matter.

With one of the largest QSA teams in Europe, SRM provide unrivalled technical and compliance expertise within the PCI arena. Our GDPR team provide a business-focused service to organisations at all ends of the GDPR-readiness spectrum. For help and support, or to discuss any aspect of PCI DSS compliance or GDPR contact Mark Nordstrom at mark.nordstrom@srm-solutions.com or 03450 21 21 51.

To gauge your level of GDPR readiness, complete our free GDPR Self Assessment Questionnaire

For more information on our GDPR services, visit our GDPR page.

To view a recording of our webinar GDPR: the roles of manual and automated penetration testing, click here.

Read more on GDPR related blogs.

Webinar Wednesday 30th May 3pm: Incident Response & Forensic Expertise – would your business survive a cyber attack or security breach?

Register for the free SRM webinar here.

As organisations endeavour to be as proactive as possible to protect themselves from a cyber attack or security incident, it is time to question if you have access to the correct expertise to respond efficiently, limit the impact and minimise disruption if you were to suffer a breach.

Join us for this informative free webinar where Alan Batey, Head of the SRM forensic team, will take you through:

  • What is a retained Incident and Forensic response service? 
  • Why do organisations need it?
  • What is the impact of not having it?
  • Why is there such a market appetite for this service in the current climate?
  • Followed by a Q&A.

Register for the free webinar here.

What we can all learn from the NHS response to WannaCry

To be truly resilient against potential attacks, it is not enough to simply look at patching the last one, but to anticipate the next. When commenting on the news that the NHS had not fared well in the recent round of cyber security checks, Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport summed up the issue.

He said on BBC Radio 4 last month that ‘The NHS has made improvements since the WannaCry attack last year, but one of the challenges in cyber security is that the criminals and the malicious actors who are trying to harm our space are moving fast, and you have to run to stay still. You can’t just make one update, you’ve got to constantly be updating’. NHS cyber security chiefs described their existing practices as ‘relatively unsophisticated’, and admitted that 88 of the 236 trusts that were assessed by NHS Digital failed to pass the required cyber security standards.

In spite of the negative publicity surrounding the event, the report did state that WannaCry’s lasting effect would have been significantly more widespread, had it not been so quickly disabled. With this issue front of mind, the Former Chairman of NHS Digital still blamed ‘a lack of focus and a lack of taking it seriously’.

So what actions are in the pipeline in order to safeguard the UK’s health service? Of course, every hospital authority will be ensuring that all software update patches are installed, after this proved to be the crippling weakness of the 80 trusts affected in last year’s cryptoworm attack. The majority of trusts had acted on this but the hesitation came from the potential implications and disruption to other IT and medical equipment.

Along with praising the initial response, it should be said that the robust plans going forward are setting the bar for others to follow. A cyber security ‘handbook’ is being issued to all employees, along with ongoing staff training and development; bringing the issue to the forefront and ensuring that everyone has their part to play.

Robust Incident Response, Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery plans are soon to be in place, reducing disruption to the operations even further in the event of an attack. This is to be reviewed and changed annually, in line with industry best-practice. It will work in tandem with both an annual ‘cyber incident rehearsal’ and Red Team-style engagements using ethical hacking teams that will consistently carry out both manual and automated penetration testing to the NHS networks. Finally, this links to their plans to appoint a CISO, after recognising that cyber security is indeed a board level issue and should be dealt with as such, as soon as possible.

It is these key practises that businesses across the globe should be looking to adopt into their next information security strategies. If your organisation is looking to mirror the proactive efforts of the NHS, SRM’s specialist solutions encompass the full scope of the governance, risk and compliance agenda. The trusted partner of government agencies, high street brands and SMEs alike, our bespoke and consultative approach enables our clients to achieve peace of mind.

To discuss how our services can help you stay safe in cyberspace, contact Mark Nordstrom on mark.nordstrom@srm-solutions.com or 03450 21 21 51. Or visit our website.

Read more:

Three stages to building a robust defence against external threats

How attack is the best form of defence when it comes to protecting against the rising trend in phishing and social engineering attacks

SRM Blog

SRM Blog